Here is the introduction to my midterm paper, which examines four major subgenres of science fiction for the purposes of readers' advisory work:
Science fiction is a wide and varied genre that attracts readers for a variety of reasons. Performing readers’ advisory work for patrons interested in science fiction can be difficult for librarians unfamiliar with the genre, but a bit of familiarity with science fiction’s subgenres and book awards can provide valuable help. This essay will examine four of science fiction’s broadest subgenres (hard science fiction, space opera, utopian fiction, and dystopian fiction), as well as major science fiction awards as beginning points for readers’ advisory. The four subgenres described here can also be thought of as two different axes for examining works belonging to the science fiction genre: hard science fiction and space opera being opposite ends of an axis that track the scientific rigor and accuracy of a work, and utopian and dystopian fiction forming another axis tracking a work’s overall tone and attitude toward the story. This is not an exact system, but provides a framework that may be helpful in a readers’ advisory capacity.
In the essay, I spend some time looking at the history of each of these four subgenres and recommend a list of books that are representative of aspects of the subgenre. For example, I examine the "hard science fiction" subgenre that focuses on scientific rigor and accuracy above all else, and also describe some of the problems this subgenre has had with bigotry, sexism, and gatekeeping. Then I contrast it with the space opera subgenre, which stands on the opposite end of the spectrum and focuses on grand scales, flashy effects, and character-driven stories.
Another axis I examine in the paper is the utopian/dystopian fiction spectrum. Utopian and dystopian fiction have lots of overlap, and fans of both types of story will defend their preference by pointing out how ultimately hopeful the subgenres can be, whether by depicting an ideal future society or by spurring readers to action by describing the worst possible future society. Stories do not tend to fall cleanly into one or the other of these subgenres, so it is helpful to think of them as opposite ends of a spectrum.
Hopefully my choice to divide science fiction into these main subgenres/axes is helpful for librarians unfamiliar with the genre looking for resources to help with advising readers who are looking for a good sci-fi book to read!
Hi! I did my paper on science fiction as well, but more on the 2015+ Hugo awards recent controversy and how science fiction has been a vessel of political change--did you happen to come across any of that in your readings? I know there was some discussion of what exactly "hard-core science fiction" meant in the controversy but I didn't know precisely what that meant and it was peripheral to my subject.
ReplyDeleteYes, I found several articles about that whole thing. I didn't go into it because it would've taken a huge chunk of the paper to explain, so I just talked in the paper about the general role of racism and sexism in the sci-fi scene. I found a good blog post by a female sci-fi writer talking about how the sexism in the STEM fields are mirrored in sci-fi - women are considered less able than men to do the "hard sciences" like physics and mathematics, so a lot of male sci-fi fans feel women shouldn't be allowed to publish properly "hard" sci-fi that strives for scientific accuracy. So that's somewhat related to the whole Sad Puppies thing, but I think the Puppies were really just pushing back against any increase in the diversity of authorship and readers in sci-fi. They weren't necessarily wanting a return to "hard sci-fi" principles, whatever that means.
ReplyDelete